Large Rant #5 – Yay, I finally get to see my Oncologist. Just Kidding. Don’t read this if you are an Oncologist:

And to think you thought there were only 4 rants lol.

Okay, so what else is new? I was supposed to have an appointment with my Oncologist on June 7th. Like a child approaching Christmas, I’ve been over the moon excited, and I’ve been telling everyone I know. The last time I saw him was about a year ago when I told him I was considering a metabolic protocol. After an incredible and lengthy debate, he somewhat concluded I probably wouldn’t kill myself but that I would be wasting money. At that time, I hadn’t mentioned DON, just the other stuff. Then, a few months later, my tumour disappeared. He had scheduled an appointment with me after but went on parental leave early, and I never got to see him. He returned in April 2024, and I booked another in-person appointment for June 7th—Wooohoo! However, I received a call yesterday informing me that he had to return to parental leave, and my appointment would not be with him. I genuinely hope his new baby and wife are healthy and he is just living his life, prioritizing them first, as he should. But simultaneously, I wish I had an oncologist who is somewhat invested in my care all the time. It doesn’t have to be the same person; just some continuity of care would be nice.

Seeing someone invested only once a year isn’t what I call ‘care,’ so it’s hardly “healthcare.” I might as well point out that m: ‘Sorry, you are going to die, and there is nothing we can do; go ahead and enjoy life, eat what you want because there is no evidence diet can change your outcome.’ Then there isn’t any ‘health’ in the healthcare either, is there? I want a doctor willing to listen to the science, perhaps open their mind with each visit, and follow my treatment with interest. They don’t have to believe or help, but paying attention would be nice. How am I supposed to cure cancer if everyone has their head in the sand?

Also, I understand that every second terminal patient comes to them with dumb ideas for cures. But how many come with data, peer-reviewed, evidence-based data? Not only that, but we have a clinical case study using a patient who is NED (No Evidence of Disease) from doing this very protocol, and coincidentally, he went to the EXACT same Cancer Clinic! Yes, what are the odds?! A patient at the Victoria Cancer Clinic cured himself of metastatic cancer after being given less than 18 months to live if he underwent major surgery, radiation, and chemo. Instead, he got heart surgery and followed the Press/Pulse protocol, he is now cancer-free. I am not shitting you, here is the case study and all this guy’s results. Is he an unexplained phenomenon, OR the Press/Pulse protocol that works 100% of the time in a lab and on mice – also works in humans? Or a miracle. Or science. Or a miracle. Oh, it must be a miracle. Let’s move on.

Dennis Stacey, a man from Victoria, BC, followed Thomas Seyfried’s Press/Pulse protocol (like I am doing) and fucking cured his cancer. He has no cancer! He was diagnosed in October 2022. He is alive and well and has NO EVIDENCE OF CANCER. After hearing everything Dennis Stacey did, his Oncologist said, ‘Hmm, so you just paid for your chemo?’ Um, no, you donkey, he followed a Metabolic Press/Pulse protocol. It’s nothing like chemo.

How do you treat a patient and have no fucking idea what they did after you have been told? Who is the doctor, and who is the patient? And how can you have a patient who cured the cancer you said no one can survive and not be curious? And how do you not maybe open Google and look up “Mitochondrial Metabolic Theory”? Anyone who clicks that link or puts 5 minutes of their brain into action will discover that every significant Cancer Center in North America is working on drugs that align with the Mitochondrial Metabolic Theory. Johns Hopkins has a prodrug version of DON called DRP-104. It’s starting phase one clinical trials, and I don’t qualify (for many reasons), but one of them is that my solid tumour is gone lol. I don’t qualify because I already proved it works! Well, Seyfried and the team have proven it works. I just put it into action because the doctors can’t don’t or won’t.

And it’s not about the drug right now; it’s about how cancer cell metabolism works. We already know the answer: Otto Warburg figured out aerobic glycolysis and glucose, and Thomas Seyfried figured out glutamine and wrapped it all in a bow for humanity. Humanity now has to get off their ass. Any medication that blocks glutamine from a cancer cell will work if combined with glucose restrictions. Restriction of either on their own might help a bit, but will not always kill cancer. If you take away the glutamine, the cancer cells eat the glucose. If you take away the glucose but only the glucose, the cancer cells will eat the glutamine. Take them both away, and cancer cells have nothing to eat. I’m sorry, Dr. Hart, but no, that is not the same as chemo. If you want to compare any part of the press/pulse protocol to the (Standard Of Care) SOC, use Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) and compare it to Chemo and Radiation. Because all three produce ROS, which induces apoptosis. Except that radiation and chemo will eventually kill you or give you cancer, or both, and HBOT will heal your body from the inside out. Hyperbaric is almost free, non-toxic, and has been around longer. So we know more about it, and we know for sure it’s a million times safer.

If you were an oncologist and a patient who was intelligent and well-spoken (obviously, I am on my best behaviour around them 🙂 ) came to you with all of this information, wouldn’t you maybe pay attention to how things go, maybe see if this BS works or not? You don’t have to look anything up; you could just smile and nod for 15 minutes while listening rather than letting your inner voice lament over the workload. And don’t get me wrong, I get it. All doctors and specialists in BC, if not everyone in Canada, have way too many patients. My oncologist has about 700. I am not making this stuff up. I would want to shoot myself in the head if I had 700 patients, but I would also think it interesting when someone cured their cancer. “Hmm, interesting; imma gonna look that up later.”

Sorry to all the oncologists, but as they say – if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. And that is your choice, and you have the freedom to make that choice. You are not bound by your license. You have a choice to let your patients feel like they can be honest with you and tell you what “alternative” or “complementary” things they are doing. And you have every freedom to listen with interest. One day, things might click and then, too, you will have a choice.